Bible Forum

The Bible NETWork ~ Impacting the World for Christ one post at a time!

It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:52 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Forum rules


There has been a large increase in political threads in this forum as of late and along with that comes discussions that get quite heated. For the time being this section of the forums are locked so that the staff may do a more complete review as we consider the purpose and the direction that we would like to see the current events section go.

While this process is being carried out, please DO NOT begin or continue any discussions of a political nature elsewhere on these boards.

We appreciate you patience and understanding as this process make take up to a month to complete. Please do not be discouraged by this decision, take this time to check out all the wonderful rooms we have here.



Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 131 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Is the GOP Sabotaging the President?
Yes, they are sabotaging the President 36%  36%  [ 4 ]
No, they want to create jobs 45%  45%  [ 5 ]
I don't know 18%  18%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 11
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
Ah, but Social Security is our country's biggest creditor. They protect the value of their reserves from inflation by buying Treasury securities with their surplus. We would owe Social Security just as much money, no matter what we do with the benefit levels. That's what no one is willing to admit unless you ask them.

Here's a link explaining it:

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/08/business/la-fi-hiltzik-20110305

Here's another link that addresses Medicare:

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hiltzik-20120113,0,442443.column

Because Medicare is so incredibly efficient when you compare it to the for-profit alternative, the potential savings are illusory. The fact that we owe Social Security so much money makes the potrntial savings in that program illusory, too.

Because when it comes down to it, when the US borrows money from hard-working Americans who have paid into Social Security, they need to be honest enough to pay it back rather than using the money to pay for tax cuts for the upper end.

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:35 pm
Posts: 1376
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Anglican
Name of your church: Currently seeking a biblical church
Assured wrote:
Sorry, Psychobob, but it *is* possible to disagree with your position without being "obedient" and a "bot." :mrgreen:
Yes, absolutely. You may begin any time. Several people here have offered substantive, fact-based rebuttals of your platitudes. You've responded by ignoring them and repeating your platitudes. Rare is a Progressive who is willing to engage in factual argument. They almost always use appeals to emotion, especially envy and empathy, as you have done.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
You do not agree with my positions. However, that does not justify character assasination and belittlement, and this is not the first time.

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
Back to jobs:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/25/obama-economic-plan-insourcing_n_1231666.html

Quoting from the link:

On the heels of President Barack Obama's State of the Union address, senior economic advisers to the president on Wednesday shared more details on Obama's blueprint for the economy, including a plan to strip incentives for companies to move jobs overseas and instead encourage the return of manufacturing jobs to U.S. soil.

Arguing that the country should build on the relative strength of its manufacturing sector, National Economic Council (NEC) Director Gene Sperling told reporters that Congress needs to remove the tax deductions that corporations can claim on moving expenses when they ship jobs overseas. In addition, he said the president is proposing a 20 percent income tax credit for companies that choose to bring jobs back to the U.S. Taken together, the two measures would be revenue-neutral, Sperling added.

"Moving jobs is not something we should be subsidizing," Sperling said. "The companies have a right to do it, but that doesn't mean we should subsidize it."

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:59 pm
Posts: 2818
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: OBC
Assured -- @ least you're consistent with the liberal-only news sources :P

Santorum has been talking about this all campaign -- his plan goes further

The gov't needs to get out of the subsidizing business -- there may be rare occasions when it makes sense & is Constitutional -- generally, it's a sign of effective lobbying vs. effective gov't


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
Quote:
Paco:
Assured -- @ least you're consistent with the liberal-only news sources :P


I saw something in the Wall Street Journal this morning, I'll try to find it again and post it.

But you agree with Santorum's approach - got it.

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
Paco wrote:
...The gov't needs to get out of the subsidizing business -- there may be rare occasions when it makes sense & is Constitutional -- generally, it's a sign of effective lobbying vs. effective gov't


You don't think the American Legislative Exchange Council membership has been lobbying enough?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Legislative_Exchange_Council

Who are the liberal lobbyists, if I may ask?

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
Ok Paco - here is literally "the latest" from the Wall Street Journal on President Obama:

http://online.wsj.com/article/declarations.html

There is also something about him entitled, "Stupid is as Stupid Does," but I am not going to justify it by propagating it. My link is from Peggy Noonan, who to my knowledge has always been pretty level-headed, and I say this as a former Republican. I am sure that Ms. Noonan is hoping the GOP will WAKE UP to the fact that they are losing the moderates and independents.

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:59 pm
Posts: 2818
Location: Milky Way Galaxy
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: OBC
Assured -- you appear to have more time to post/research than i -- or maybe the consecutive posts means you simply enjoy talking with us all :wink:

Assured wrote:
But you agree with Santorum's approach - got it
i didn't say that -- what i said is this is something Santorum has touted for over a yr -- am initially against it but haven't had time to ponder/research all that it entails

Assured wrote:
Who are the liberal lobbyists, if I may ask?
lobbyists, no matter their stripe, are not looking out for the interests of our nation -- hence, they need to go

i don't subscribe to the WSJ so cannot read the link

Assured wrote:
the GOP will WAKE UP to the fact that they are losing the moderates and independents
perhaps they are losing YOU but i've not seen any trends that support your assertion


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
Quote:
Paco:

Assured -- you appear to have more time to post/research than i -- or maybe the consecutive posts means you simply enjoy talking with us all


LOL - I don't read them just to post here! I am already reading them. People post on what they know, of course. I am no different.

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
Quote:
Paco:

i don't subscribe to the WSJ so cannot read the link


Dang it!

Let me see if I can dig up a syndicated version of her column - I hope she is syndicated...

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
She has her own website, where she'll let us see it for free!

(Thanks, Peggy! :) )

http://peggynoonan.com/article.php?article=612

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:07 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 11:34 pm
Posts: 5535
Location: Northern California
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Pentecostal
Name of your church: The Rivers Foursquare Church
Assured wrote:
Paco wrote:
...The gov't needs to get out of the subsidizing business -- there may be rare occasions when it makes sense & is Constitutional -- generally, it's a sign of effective lobbying vs. effective gov't
You don't think the American Legislative Exchange Council membership has been lobbying enough?
I'm not aware of any ALEC lobbying for subsidies, are you? Primarily, they serve as a voice of private enterprise to legislators who make laws that regulate private enterprise. It's kind of a novel idea, getting input from the people who will be most directly affected by legislation before legislating.

_________________
"The person who has my commandments and obeys them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and will reveal myself to him." (John 14:21)

Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
The NET Bible Study Environment
Pastors Pro-Life Resource Center
Biblical Eldership


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:38 pm
Posts: 792
Location: USA
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Not sure if you're going to publish it
Businesses don't WANT to be regulated. Even the ones that should be - such as oil / petroleum and banks. So they lobby for reduced regulation. Sounds like the lunatics are running the asylum if you ask me...

_________________
Blessed Assurance, Jesus is mine

Oh what a foretaste of glory divine!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:35 pm
Posts: 1376
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Anglican
Name of your church: Currently seeking a biblical church
Assured wrote:
Sounds like the lunatics are running the asylum if you ask me...
So you say that me pointing out your lack of substantive arguments is "character assasination and belittlement" but calling American Legislative Exchange Council "lunatics" is just fine? All I'm saying is that you seem to have a robotic loyalty to President Obama and Democrats, and a robotic derision of Republicans (even when it is pointed out that Obama and the Democrats are doing some of the exact things you are accusing the Republicans of doing). Your arguments consist of repetition of Progressive talking points and appeals to emotion.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 131 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group