Bible Forum

The Bible NETWork ~ Impacting the World for Christ one post at a time!

It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:48 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Forum rules


There has been a large increase in political threads in this forum as of late and along with that comes discussions that get quite heated. For the time being this section of the forums are locked so that the staff may do a more complete review as we consider the purpose and the direction that we would like to see the current events section go.

While this process is being carried out, please DO NOT begin or continue any discussions of a political nature elsewhere on these boards.

We appreciate you patience and understanding as this process make take up to a month to complete. Please do not be discouraged by this decision, take this time to check out all the wonderful rooms we have here.



Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:24 pm 
Offline
Site Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 9:41 pm
Posts: 4892
Location: Administrator of Site - D/FW
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: CountrySide Bible Church
Another thing....

Gideon you said
Quote:
Even worse, the church has participated in it. According to some polls, 70% of women obtaining abortions identify themselves as Christians (43% Protestant, 27% Catholic). Among them 18% identify themselves as born-again or evangelical Christians. Thousands of self-identified born-again or evangelical Christians are killing their own children through surgical abortion every week in the United States! Is this why we stand by doing nothing? Is this why we do not speak up for those who cannot speak? Is this why we do not plead the cause of the fatherless in such a way as to win it? Is this why we fail to rescue those who are being unjustly led to slaughter? Is it because we ourselves participate in the works of darkness that we do not obey God's commands to defend the defenseless?


Maybe these girls/women felt like they had no choice. Yes I know that is wrong there is always a choice. However depending on the 'christian' (and I use the term loosely) environment these woman came from, the shame, being outcast, and in general the condemnation these girls/women would have to listen to from fellow 'christians' about getting pregnant in the first place probably made them feel like they had no other choice. Christianity is the only 'religion' that has a history of 'shooting their wounded'.

I have volunteered many hours of the years helping to counsel women who have had an abortion - Christian girls/women who were tossed under the bus when either A) the 'church family' found out they were pregnant, or B) called them murderers after the fact. There is no love, no forgiveness. It's none of the above Gideon, we fail to rescue those who are being unjustly led to slaughter because we have failed the recognize those in need, because we have failed to love them no matter where they were, because we failed to show grace and mercy, we have failed to provide help and guidance and acceptance.

Christians are so busy - after the fact - condemning both the unmarried pregnant girl (who may have been raped) as well as those who have had abortions that women/girls in this situation feel there is no other option. They believe - how can God ever love me, christians will call me a murderer, I'm worthless...

_________________
Jennifer Dent
Site Administrator

Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
The Net Bible Learning Environment
The Administrators Desk Blog

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:37 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 11:34 pm
Posts: 5535
Location: Northern California
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Pentecostal
Name of your church: The Rivers Foursquare Church
For the record, the Virginia law that Governor McDonnell signed into law does not require a woman to view an ultrasound before aborting her child. It only requires that an ultrasound be done and that the woman be given the option of viewing it. And the law does not require that invasive trans-vaginal ultrasounds be performed; it only requires that trans-abdominal ultrasounds be performed.

As for what power the government should have in the issue of abortion, I believe the scriptures are clear that civil government's God-ordained role is to approve of what is good and to punish evil deeds (Rom 13:1-4). Governing authorities are God's servants to administer justice. And justice would be (a) to protect the lives of the innocent by prohibiting abortion and (b) to punish the taking of their lives. That is civil government's divine mandate. Therefore if government were to require women to view an ultrasound before having their children killed, such a requirement would fall well within government's divinely granted authority and far short of its divinely appointed role.

I agree completely that God has commanded us not only to show compassion and mercy to preborn children by defending them and rescuing them from execution, but also to show compassion and mercy to women and girls who have either had abortions or are faced with making an abortion decision. It is not a question of doing one or the other; we are to do both. And preventing abortions is one way of doing both. We save children's lives and we save women and girls from killing their own children—an act which haunts most women who go down that road and which can have long-term destructive effects in their lives.

_________________
"The person who has my commandments and obeys them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and will reveal myself to him." (John 14:21)

Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
The NET Bible Study Environment
Pastors Pro-Life Resource Center
Biblical Eldership


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:54 am
Posts: 1439
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Evangelical Free Church
Name of your church: Agape
Paco wrote:
strider33 -- i wholeheartedly agree with your post but must quibble with 1 stmt:

Strider33 wrote:
Whenever men, including me, get involved in discussing abortion law, it's inevitable that we're discussing matters whose consequences do not affect us as individuals.
men are indirectly effected as the loss of life impacts mankind -- men are also effected when male babies are aborted (aka killed)

Randy/Gideon -- very well said -- the # of deaths is STAGGERING -- am certain Hitler would be proud of this program's "effectiveness"

just 1 more reason a certain individual needs to take his lifetime Secret Service protection home to Chicago...


Perhaps I should have said "do not directly affect us as individuals".

_________________
Not all those who wander are lost.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:54 am
Posts: 1439
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Evangelical Free Church
Name of your church: Agape
My grown daughter is involved in a Christian ministry to women going through a crisis pregnancy. I'm not going to claim credit for what she does. But she is putting herself into it.

That ministry does have a section that deals with post abortion distress... which can last for decades! Often the advocates of simple and easy abortions don't talk much about this.

_________________
Not all those who wander are lost.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:40 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 2764
Location: Texas
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
Name of your church: Oak Grove Baptist
Jennifer Dent wrote:
The saving of one life does not mean that the liberty of another should be removed.
So, one's liberty to not wear a seat belt is.....
Shall we speak of city smoking prohibitions? Or perhaps any of a various set of gun laws.

Jennifer Dent wrote:
Y'all may feel differently but to me that is no different then requiring men that want to get a Rx for Viagra to submit to drug screening and a rectal exam.
Well, I do feel differently because that is a different situation. First, Viagra is not something that will directly take another life. Next, I'm as against Viagra from the gov't hopper as I am BC. (But that is another topic.) I just find it curious that you ladies seem to keep bringing Viagra up.

Jennifer Dent wrote:
This issue is NOT about getting an abortion it is about the government forcing someone to do something they do not want to do.
Who is about to force someone else into the ash heap. I'm all for making abortion illegal once again and this little liberty would then be protected.

Jennifer Dent wrote:
, I firmly believe that the government has NO RIGHT to dictate these things as mandatory....that should be up to the woman.
Why?
Jennifer Dent wrote:
Christianity is the only 'religion' that has a history of 'shooting their wounded'.
You seriously have not checked out some of the cults as well as some of our Islamic folk out there. This issue is more universal than you portray it perhaps because you live on the edge of the Bible belt in quite the Christianized "Metroplex burbs".

Jennifer Dent wrote:
Christians are so busy - after the fact - condemning both the unmarried pregnant girl (who may have been raped) as well as those who have had abortions that women/girls in this situation feel there is no other option. They believe - how can God ever love me, christians will call me a murderer, I'm worthless...
I'm sure that there are many out there who feel this way (Both Christian and non). I will say that the (may have been raped) sidebar is an emotional amp which turns this discussion onto a-whole-nother level. None of this argument (icluding the rape sidebar) makes aborting the child morally right nor does it argue in any rational form against a lady having to view the child before she agrees to have it removed from the living.

Further, Christians and those with a Biblical moral sense lost this battle in the courtroom I think because we were not ready for the non-sensical argument of "privacy" to hold water as it did in Roe. IMO a great deal of our social ills came right out of that Pandora's box. You are right that this battle need to be won in the hearts of the believers, then in the hearts of a majority of the people, but most of all it surely does need to be taken into and won in the various halls of legislation both state & federal.

_________________
Blessings,
Randy
Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
The Net Bible Online


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:46 am 
Offline
Site Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 9:41 pm
Posts: 4892
Location: Administrator of Site - D/FW
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: CountrySide Bible Church
Really quickly Randy as I'm in the middle of my final :) . .

viagra is a drug used by my to have sex....it's a sexual drug - sometimes used by men in order to have sex in order to reproduce children, why shouldn't men have to loop through hoops the way women do?

Now I've said this before and I will say it again, I personally believe that abortion is wrong and we should do what we can in order to slow and eventually stop it from happening in the first place. I personally believe that every woman SHOULD view and hear the baby before making that final decision.....

Having said that. . .it should be the decision of the doctor and the patient what needs to happen when discussing surgery of any kind.

This thread is NOT about the legality of abortion or even whether it is right or wrong - it is about the government's continual intrusion into the lives of of people. Whether or not a woman having an abortion choose to view or not view the ultrasound should be between her and her doctor.


----
every single abortion clinic should have the following on site:

counselor's
access to information that cover's ALL their options (including access to adoption agencies, wic representatives and assistance with the baby)

patients should also be required to wait at least 7 days after the initial visit to think about it....
-----

all of these things I am sure would bring the rates of performed abortions down, and without more government interference into the lives of the citizens.

_________________
Jennifer Dent
Site Administrator

Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
The Net Bible Learning Environment
The Administrators Desk Blog

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:04 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:54 am
Posts: 2764
Location: Texas
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
Name of your church: Oak Grove Baptist
Jennifer Dent wrote:
Viagra is a drug used by (men) to have sex....it's a sexual drug - sometimes used by men in order to have sex in order to reproduce children,
I would suggest the "reproduction" group of this crowd is quite low.
Jennifer Dent wrote:
why shouldn't men have to loop through hoops the way women do?
I'm not sure that they don't but, I really don't care. It has nothing to do with the discussion at hand. It's different. I'd say I'm against it being provided or mandated by the Gov't just the same as BC. I'd say one should see their doctor and have the necessary tests BEFORE taking any drug.

Requiring someone to view the ultrasound before the abortion does not impede the doctor/patient decision process nor does it intrude any more than requiring doctor to be certified to practice medicine. The doctor and patient would still be able to talk about what happens during the procedure and the decision would not be affected by the gov't but rather the viewing of the ultrasound may cause the woman to think clearly of what the result of her decision would be.

There are some areas that intrusion is inevitable and quite necessary. This is not an intrusion into any one's life but rather a requirement to see what one is about to remove from her body. At most, it causes the consult with the doctor to take a bit more time and gives the complete picture of what is being done.

_________________
Blessings,
Randy
Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
The Net Bible Online


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 83
Location: ...the beautiful Sonoran Desert
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: church
Jennifer and Strider...well stated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:26 pm
Posts: 83
Location: ...the beautiful Sonoran Desert
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: church
...and of course one Arizona State Rep wants to take it a step further....quote from a letter she wrote a constituent:

"Personally I'd like to make a law that mandates a woman watch an abortion being performed prior to having a "surgical procedure". If it's not a life it shouldn't matter, if it doesn't harm a woman then she shouldn't care, and don't we want more transparency and education in the medical profession anyway? We demand it everywhere else.

Until the dead child can tell me that she/he does not feel any pain - I have no intentions of clearing the conscience of the living - I will be voting YES."
Rep. Terri Proud, R-Tucson

http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/P ... der/157762


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:08 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 11:34 pm
Posts: 5535
Location: Northern California
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Pentecostal
Name of your church: The Rivers Foursquare Church
That would certainly make a woman much better informed about the procedure before going ahead with it. IMO, most women would not choose to have an abortion after having watched one. I watched a filmed surgical abortion once myself. It caused me to weep. And it forever changed my perception of abortion.

_________________
"The person who has my commandments and obeys them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and will reveal myself to him." (John 14:21)

Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
The NET Bible Study Environment
Pastors Pro-Life Resource Center
Biblical Eldership


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group