Bible Forum

The Bible NETWork ~ Impacting the World for Christ one post at a time!

It is currently Mon May 20, 2013 9:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Forum rules


Welcome to Church History/History of Christianty

We have broken down this forum to better facilitate discussion of Church History into managable eras :) If you are a History buff then we need you!

Below you will find the list of all the Subforums within this forum. Happy studying!



As always the boards Code of Conduct applies as well.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:41 pm
Posts: 11
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
Name of your church: Birchwood Baptist Church
I'm trying to do some research and cannot seem to find good info that is more historical instead of theological. Who, what, when, and how was fish allowed to be eaten on Good Friday in the Catholic church? Most information that I'm finding is seems to be talking about the blood and the sacrifice but I'm looking for dates when it was allowed by who and the reasoning they (not the current church) gave for it.

I would appreciate any help directing me to the right sources.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 8:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 3:19 pm
Posts: 1012
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
Rebecca, as a former Catholic who was in 7th/8th grade during Vatican II, I can tell you you're researching the wrong issue. There is nothing about eating fish on Friday of significance other than the fact that "fish" is not "meat." There was no "allowance" to each fish, there was a prohibition from eating meat. Start your research there.

Try some of these links.

http://us.yhs.search.yahoo.com/avg/sear ... on+fridays

Regards.

_________________
All Scripture quotations are New American Standard Bible, unless otherwise indicated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:02 pm
Posts: 1546
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Here's the dope,
In parts of the US, Catholics are the majority religion. Long, long ago, there was this sin (or something) for Catholics to eat meat on Friday. So it became Fish Day for almost everyone in these areas due to simple economics. Restaurants, and even public schools, served fish on Fridays.

I still feel bad for those Catholics serving time in Purgatory, while watching contemporary Catholics wolfing down burgers sin-free on Friday. TGIF!

S

_________________
Behold, now is "THE ACCEPTABLE TIME,"
behold, now is "THE DAY OF SALVATION" --
The apostle Paul, NASB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 10:42 am
Posts: 37
Location: Montreal, Canada
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Church of Jesus Christ
Serendipity wrote:
In parts of the US, Catholics are the majority religion. Long, long ago, there was this sin (or something) for Catholics to eat meat on Friday. So it became Fish Day for almost everyone in these areas due to simple economics. Restaurants, and even public schools, served fish on Fridays.


Ah Ha! That's where McDonald's Filet-O-Fish comes from! It's a Catholic Conspiracy to push fish products! Is this a Catholic company:

http://www.yuwanmei.com

Serendipity wrote:
I still feel bad for those Catholics serving time in Purgatory, while watching contemporary Catholics wolfing down burgers sin-free on Friday. TGIF!


I think they must be out on parole since the RC Church okayed BigMacs on Fridays.

Roger

_________________
Fame is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 3:19 pm
Posts: 1012
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
Deleted my comment after second thoughts.

_________________
All Scripture quotations are New American Standard Bible, unless otherwise indicated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 2:57 pm 
Online
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:08 am
Posts: 2787
Location: Upper Midwest
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Pentecostal (AoG)
Name of your church: Karlstad Assembly of God
Here is a lengthy article that offers the history of Lent (interesting enough, fish should probably not be consumed, but because there appears to have been the tendencey towards lesser and lesser fasting this has lead to more and more allowances) http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09152a.htm

_________________
Everyone is equal at the foot of the cross...just some are more equal than others.
Forum Code of Conduct
Bible.org Doctrinal Statement
rickwadholmjr.wordpress.com
iheartbarth.wordpress.com
bluechippastor.org
Twitter: @RickWadholmJr


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:02 pm
Posts: 1546
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
JIm would remember this better than I. I think it was EVERY Friday, right?

S

_________________
Behold, now is "THE ACCEPTABLE TIME,"
behold, now is "THE DAY OF SALVATION" --
The apostle Paul, NASB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 3:19 pm
Posts: 1012
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
S, are you making a slur on my age? :)

Yes, it was every Friday. And to eat meat on Friday was considered a mortal sin, i.e., a sin that if not confessed, was grievous enough to send you straight to Hell, no stopping in Purgatory.

I just found this link of interest:
http://www.catholic-pages.com/life/fridaymeat.asp

Regards.

_________________
All Scripture quotations are New American Standard Bible, unless otherwise indicated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:02 pm
Posts: 1546
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Anti,
When I was a Catholic kid in the US (post Vat2) I distinctly remember only one serious fast (the fish thing was just old habit at this point). You could not eat anything on Sunday until after taking Communion. I think this helped the after-church brunch thing take off. I don't think this is required any more.
S

_________________
Behold, now is "THE ACCEPTABLE TIME,"
behold, now is "THE DAY OF SALVATION" --
The apostle Paul, NASB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:02 pm
Posts: 1546
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Jim,
I meant no offense. I may have been baptized pre-VII, but I was too young to remember it. One pet peeve (correct me if I'm wrong). Purgatory is only for the heaven bound, although God only knows when you get out. Hell is a direct, non-stop flight. Memories! :-)
S

_________________
Behold, now is "THE ACCEPTABLE TIME,"
behold, now is "THE DAY OF SALVATION" --
The apostle Paul, NASB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:35 pm
Posts: 1376
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Anglican
Name of your church: Currently seeking a biblical church
Generally Eastern Orthodox are not nearly as lenient. On Wednesdays and Fridays, Orthodox are not permitted to eat meat (including poultry) and any meat products such as lard and meat broth,
fish (fish with backbones - shellfish are permitted), eggs and dairy products (milk, butter, cheese, etc.), olive oil, wine and other alcoholic drinks.
However, there are several times a year when fasting is not permitted (like between Christmas and Theophany). While they strongly encourage weekly fasts, it isn't a "damnable sin" (generally the Eastern church uses carrots instead of whips to get people to follow church rules).

_________________
Στηθι εδραιος, ως ακμων τυπτομενος. - Ignatius |II Timothy 4:2| All Scripture is NKJV, unless a translation from the Greek text or otherwise noted.
M.A. Theological Studies (New Testament), Faith Seminary, Tacoma WA
Member, Evangelical Theological Society, North American Patristics Society.
Assistant Editor and contributing author of several published and forthcoming publications.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 9:41 pm
Posts: 11
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
Name of your church: Birchwood Baptist Church
Thank you so much for your comments and suggestions. I'll look into the them all especially about focusing more on the meat part instead of the fish. You are right that it is a much bigger picture.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 7:41 am
Posts: 1328
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Catholic
Name of your church: Catholic Church
Fasting of every kind is a discipline rather than a doctrine. People are free to fast at times and seasons of their own choosing, but the Church can call the faithful to fast at certain times. Lent and Advent are penitential seasons and thus on fridays of these seasons the faithful are called to fast.

Cheers

_________________
The proof of love is in the works. Where love exists, it works great things. But when it ceases to act, it ceases to exist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 7:34 pm
Posts: 974
Location: Denver
One interesting question is why fish is not considered meat. A fish is, after all, an animal.

There's a parallel categorization in Judaism. Rabbinic law forbids the consumption of meat and dairy products together. As this prohibition is derived from Deuteronomy 14:21, originally it applied only to mammals and was later extended to birds, so one is not permitted to consume a combination of dairy and poultry. But there's no prohibition against consuming dairy and fish together (shellfish is forbidden anyhow, so that's not an issue).

I'm wondering if the Catholic classification of fish as non-meat is somehow related to the rabbinic classification of fish as non-meat. One derived from the other? Or perhaps a common source?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 7:41 am
Posts: 1328
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Catholic
Name of your church: Catholic Church
It probably comes from apostolic example - which no doubt has Jewish roots. Saint Paul divides the different kinds of "flesh" in 1 Corinthians.[1] But I imagine that there would have been a number of considerations that formed the foundations of the differentiation. Some may have been cultural, some may have been observational - many fish do not have red blood, or at least appear not to have red blood while land animal meats tend to have red blood.

Cheers

    [1] For not all flesh is alike, but there is one kind for men, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish.
    [1 Corinthians 15:39 RSV]

_________________
The proof of love is in the works. Where love exists, it works great things. But when it ceases to act, it ceases to exist.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group