Bible Forum

The Bible NETWork ~ Impacting the World for Christ one post at a time!

It is currently Mon May 20, 2013 11:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Forum rules


Greetings and welcome to the Evangelical Theology and Discussion Forum.
I want to share the following passage with you from Hebrews 5:12-6:3 (NET)


Quote:
Hebrews 5:12-6:3
12 For though you should in fact be teachers by this time, you need someone to teach you the beginning elements of God’s utterances. You have gone back to needing milk, not solid food. 13 For everyone who lives on milk is inexperienced in the message of righteousness, because he is an infant. 14 But solid food is for the mature, whose perceptions are trained by practice to discern both good and evil. 1 Therefore we must progress beyond the elementary instructions about Christ and move on to maturity, not laying this foundation again: repentance from dead works and faith in God, 2 teaching about baptisms, laying on of hands, resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. 3 And this is what we intend to do, if God permits.

Our intention is to provide a forum where evangelical believers can discuss questions of theology, faith, and practice from a strictly evangelical perspective. We wish to provide a forum where believers can chew on the meat of the Word of God rather than continually debating and defending the most basic tenets of the faith. While there is a place for apologetics, witnessing, answering questions raised by seekers, and discipling new believers, there is likewise a need for believers to continue to grow in their own maturity. To accomplish this requires ongoing discussion among believers who are in agreement on the most fundamental and essential doctrines of the historic Christian faith.

If you have signed up for this forum, you are a genuine believer in Christ and you are committed to the following essential doctrines of the Christian faith, which all evangelicals agree with:
  • The inspiration, authority and inerrancy of Scripture (in the original manuscripts)
  • The Trinity
  • The deity and incarnation of Christ - fully God and fully man.
  • The plight of all mankind - separated from God because of sin.
  • The answer to man's plight - Jesus Christ - the only Way to God
  • The substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ in His self-offering on the cross
  • The physical resurrection of Jesus Christ and bodily ascension to the right hand of God the Father.
  • The promise of the physical resurrection of all people - some to eternal life, others to eternal hell.
  • Salvation comes by God's grace solely through the means of faith in Christ alone and this is the gift of God.
  • The physical return of Christ.

While Christians should agree on these essential doctrines there are numerous "secondary" issues and interpretations for which we can hold different views. While we understand that there is truly only one right answer to the issues on which we differ, we acknowledge that differences of opinion legitimately arise because:
  • 1. Scripture was written in a historical/social context very different from our own.
  • 2. Although Scripture has been preserved for us and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness (2 Tim. 3:16), it was not written directly to us.
  • 3. Scripture is silent on many matters, providing us high level principles to guide our actions but silent in many specific do's and don't's.
  • 4. Scripture is filled with paradoxes we simply cannot explain. Explanations where Scripture is silent is human opinion and leads to different viewpoints.
  • 5. Many beliefs within evangelical theology are the product of deductive reasoning rather than inductive reading.
  • 6. Many "debatable" beliefs, traditions, or dogma within evangelical theology result from pulling verses out of context to support human tradition (proof-texting).


To ensure that this forum functions in accordance with its purpose, we must insist on the following code of conduct:
  • 1. All rules of Bible.org forums apply to this forum.
  • 2. Questions about the essential doctrines listed above are acceptable, however questioning the validity of the essential doctrines is out of scope for this forum.
  • 3. Dogmatism on secondary matters will be strongly and publicly discouraged.
  • 4. The Bible, not Systematic Theology, is the final authority on all issues although citations from known authorities are acceptable and helpful.
  • 5. Frequent reference should be made to what the scholars on Bible.org teach.
  • 6. Moderators will point out if positions or arguments are inconsistent with evangelical theology.
  • 7. Posts which in any way belittle another member of the forum, taunt, bait, or flame will be deleted in full as soon as a moderator spots it. If you are on the receiving end and respond "in kind," your post will be deleted as well. The moderators in this forum reserve the right to delete your post in these circumstances without notification to you.


Basically, this forum may not be the place for you if you have a low tolerance level for disagreement or take contrary views personally. It is not the place for you if you are dogmatic on secondary issues or have an argumentative spirit. This forum is not for you if you see yourself as a teacher and not a learner (I Cor. 4:6-13). If the primary purpose of your participation is not to grow in maturity and help others grow as well, please do not participate.

To join this forum please select "evangelical discussion" from the usergroup menu located at the top of the index page.

Thanks



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:37 pm
Posts: 189
Location: Toronto, Canada
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Protestant (Garden variety)
Name of your church: Christian Missionary Alliance
It seems the more I try to understand how the term "Evangelical" evolved the more I get confused :? .

Did Jonathan Edwards, George Whitfield, and John Weslley call themselves as "Evangelical"? What did that term mean to people living in the 18th century?

What are the core tenants of being an Evangelical? Do these beliefs change much?

What variations are there within the "Evangelical" circle today?

Is a Fundamentalist the same as an Evangelical? (I think up till the 20th century they were, then somehow went back and forth interchangably)

Sorry, I know it's a handful, thanks for all your assistance.

_________________
Studying MDiv. (Biblical Studies) at Tyndale Seminary
My Pastor's testimony "Street Kid to Preacher" - http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p ... 1A10FF286C


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:35 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 11:08 am
Posts: 2788
Location: Upper Midwest
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Pentecostal (AoG)
Name of your church: Karlstad Assembly of God
Kevin Bauder (President of Central Seminary) has written quite a bit about Fundamentalism and recently has written several helpful articles dealing with the relationship between Fundamentalists and Evangelicals. Here is one of them. I'll see if I can find some of the others another day.

_________________
Everyone is equal at the foot of the cross...just some are more equal than others.
Forum Code of Conduct
Bible.org Doctrinal Statement
rickwadholmjr.wordpress.com
iheartbarth.wordpress.com
bluechippastor.org
Twitter: @RickWadholmJr


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:37 pm
Posts: 189
Location: Toronto, Canada
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Protestant (Garden variety)
Name of your church: Christian Missionary Alliance
Thanks for the article, I finally had a chance to read it.

Is there really such a distaste amongst fundamentalists to associate themselves with conservative evangelicals as the article suggests? I guess I'm just totally out of the loop on this topic.

_________________
Studying MDiv. (Biblical Studies) at Tyndale Seminary
My Pastor's testimony "Street Kid to Preacher" - http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p ... 1A10FF286C


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:35 pm
Posts: 1376
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Anglican
Name of your church: Currently seeking a biblical church
I am evangelical and fundamentalist, but not Evangelical or Fundamentalist. :wink:

To me, "Fundamentalists" have become the 21st century version of Pharisees. They like to run around making a big deal out of minute issues; issues that they have created by adding things to the Bible to fit their hyper-conservative social beliefs. They often view every other tradition as a "perversion" of the Gospel, while failing to recognize that they may be "perverting" parts of it themselves. A lot of them are laser focused on one issue, like King-James-Only, anti-Calvinism or anti-eccumenicalism.

IMO, "Evangelicals" are Fundamentalist-lite. They still hold on to a lot of Funamentalism's beliefs, but aren't as vitriolic about it. The article Anti linked to calls these "Conservative evangelicals." My idea of an "Evangelical" is one who goes to a non-denominational church, doesn't drink or smoke, only listens to CCM, and doesn't know a much theology but can give you a detailed review of the latest Christian novels and self-help books.

These may be caricatures, but this is my perception of them, having grown up in these circles and keeping up with their goings on.

_________________
Στηθι εδραιος, ως ακμων τυπτομενος. - Ignatius |II Timothy 4:2| All Scripture is NKJV, unless a translation from the Greek text or otherwise noted.
M.A. Theological Studies (New Testament), Faith Seminary, Tacoma WA
Member, Evangelical Theological Society, North American Patristics Society.
Assistant Editor and contributing author of several published and forthcoming publications.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:29 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: Durham, UK
The common shortcoming of these groups seems to be a preoccupation with drawing and maintaining boundaries around themselves...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 8:50 am 
Offline
Sr. Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:53 am
Posts: 1348
Location: North Dakota
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Lutheran
Well it's certainly not just those groups.

Anytime a group has distinctions, those things tend to make a fence around the group. Often it's not that way at first, but tends to develop into a pietism over succeeding generations. A pietism where those distinctives tend to be the judging of who is and isn't saved and hence the fence of "true believers" vs. "others".

Thing is, there are many Fundamentalists who have no such fence, and because one doesn't see it, one likely doesn't think of them as Fundamentalists. However, pietists and legalists very likely will refer to themselves as Fundamentalist, even when their distinctives, violate the fundamentals.

It's much like most people think of themselves as conservative, even though many of them clearly are not. Many who call themselves Fundamentalists clearly are not.

_________________
Marv
Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
The NeXt Bible Learning Environment
The Bible NETwork Blogs

BeneSHOP: Help support Bible.org at no additional cost to you when you shop!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 12:07 pm
Posts: 46
Location: Old World
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Protestant (Garden variety)
Name of your church: Local Parish
In short, to be an Evangelical is to believe the gospel, the evangelium. All Christians worth their salt must be "Evangelical" by default.

Personally, I think of myself as a Reformed Catholic.

_________________
"THE LORD is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?" (Psalm 27:1)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 7:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 1058
Location: Charlotte, MI
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
Name of your church: New Life Fellowhip
Psychobobicus, I agree with a lot of what you wrote but I think that comparing fundamentalists to Pharisees is perhaps a little bit too critical. However, I do agree some fundamentalists (most of my background and education came from fundamentalism) have come close to being Pharisaical.

When I think of fundamentalism I go back to the four volume set of books called "The Fundamentals" ca. 1910, edited by R.A. Torrey and A.C. Dixon. Articles in these volumes were written by fundamentally minded believers from many different denominations. These articles were like a line in the sand; they were a stand against higher criticism, modernism, evolution, and their confirmation of belief in the trinity, salvation by grace, the infallibility of Scripture, etc.

Mark A. Noll, has an interesting book titled "The Rise of Evangelicalism."
Evangelicalism is a rather fluid term. It had been used in the past (middle ages) as a term to describe belief in Jesus and the New Testament. Later, during the Reformation, the term referred to the Protestant Reformation. In Noll's book, he cites David Bebbington and his list of four ingredients of evangelicalism:
Conversion or the belief that lives need to be changed
The Bible - the belief that all spiritual truth is found in its pages
The dedication of all believers to the service of God
Christ's death provided atonement and reconciliation to God
pages 16-19

I consider myself to be an evangelical but fundamental in my core beliefs. However, I do agree that many times some fundamentalists can start arguments over some trivial things.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:34 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 11:34 pm
Posts: 5493
Location: Northern California
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Pentecostal
Name of your church: The Rivers Foursquare Church
psychobobicus wrote:
My idea of an "Evangelical" is one who goes to a non-denominational church, doesn't drink or smoke, only listens to CCM, and doesn't know a much theology but can give you a detailed review of the latest Christian novels and self-help books.
Although I call myself Evangelical, I don't belong to a nondenominational church (though I have). I don't smoke, but I have friends in my church who do. I frequently drink wine with dinner and occasionally have a beer, though always with moderation and never to the point of intoxication. I don't even know what CCM is. And I like to think I know a little theology (I do work at it), but I haven't read a Christian novel in decades and the only "self-help" books I read are counseling or discipleship oriented and rooted in Scripture.

I did visit a large local church recently for a funeral and read some of their literature while waiting in the foyer. One piece of literature talked about their beliefs and practices, and I was surprised to read that members in good standing of their church do not dance or play cards! What's that about?

_________________
Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brothers to dwell together in unity!

Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
The NET Bible Study Environment
Pastors Pro-Life Resource Center
Biblical Eldership


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 1058
Location: Charlotte, MI
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
Name of your church: New Life Fellowhip
You brought up some good points Gideon. I think CCM is contemporary Christian Music - this is the title of a magazine that discussed all of the Christian hits.

It is interesting that many times we get caught up in the denominational setting as opposed to being a Christian. It is so easy to be caught up in the doing of the Christian life as opposed to simply being. Anyone can work a list don't smoke, chew, etc. but the lists will only please man. We need to teach people to let the Spirit work in them so that they focus on being like Christ.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:31 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 7:42 pm
Posts: 1194
Location: High Desert
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Calvary Chapel Redmond, Oregon http://calvarychapelredmond.com/
Well, I do go to a non-denominational church, ie. Calvary Chapel Redmond, but we don't talk about being an evangelical needing any of those requirements. Just as the apostles were from low reputation, we believe that as soon as Christ is in a persons life, that person will evangelize. My pastor said once, 'if you don't feel you are worthy to do ministry work, you are definitely qualified'. The only christian books I know of are in my bible study software. As for music... each must reconcile to themselves what he/she listens to.

I think I might know more about my wifes hair products than theology...LOL, but like you said Gideon, I am working at it. And my self help book starts in Genesis.

I think being evangelical, is being Christ-like and when ever possible, sharing the word and loving ones neighbor. Pastor Anthony said "You may be the only bible that person ever reads."

That one gave me pause and I had to do a personal inventory quick! :shock:

_________________
MARANATHA

_____________________________________________________
Forum Code of Conduct
The Bible NETWork Doctrinal Statement
http://www.answersingenesis.org/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group