Bible Forum

The Bible NETWork ~ Impacting the World for Christ one post at a time!

It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 7:09 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: hey guys
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:27 am 
Dale77,


Well the way i think of this whole convo. is that, you know how someone said "If we cant see God does that mean he isnt real?" I totally disagree with that because we cant see the wind, but it doesnt mean its not there? Also just because we cant see, feel, or hear God doesnt mean he isnt there. If you are a christian you can see the effects of what God does in others lives. So just because you cant see something, doesnt mean its not there.


Luv,
Mia a christian :)

no offence to anyone.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:10 am
Posts: 72
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Faith: Christian
mia wrote:
Also just because we cant see, feel, or hear God doesnt mean he isnt there. If you are a christian you can see the effects of what God does in others lives. So just because you cant see something, doesnt mean its not there.


Very true. Jesus used the very example of the wind in the trees for those moved by the spirit of God. Also, we can hear God in his word. Although he is not physically with us we have many letters from him. In these letters he lets us know he'll be back soon...

Dale

_________________
Its all greek to me...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:29 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: Durham, UK
On the subject of the image of God, I heard an interesting view from Tom Wright (Bishop of Durham). Images of rulers, he says, in the ancient world as in parts of it today, are put in place to remind the populace of who's in charge. Statues of Queen Victoria, or of Roman, Babylonian or Egyptian emperors/pharaohs/kings, or of Lenin, Saddam Hussein or Kim Jong Il, all serve the same end.

Our purpose, as image-bearers of the one true God, is and always has been to remind the creation of who is ultimately in charge; and more than that, as living image-bearers, it has been to carry the Creator's rule into action. The fall threw something of a spanner into this, of course; but as new creatures in Christ, our image-bearing function is restored, and given new impetus. We are to pray for and to see the Kingdom coming in the world around us.
____________

Zapp wrote:
If you attempt to gain "origins" related grant money your work will be heavily scrutinized by true-believers who will squash most attempts at real science that might somehow result in even MORE facts that refute the humanist-Darwinian cultus.
The humanist-Darwinian cultus is not particularly susceptible to refutation by facts; but then, neither is it subscribed to by the vast majority of people who work in the sciences. Most scientists are rather impatient of the metaphysical claims made for science by a few of their more eminent colleagues.

If, on the other hand, you're referring to the scientific consensus on the age of the earth and the development of life, perhaps you'd like to start some threads on evidences which refute this.

Quote:
...Then the party loyalists would descend on the targets and in some cases jail or kill them. Usually they don't have to resort to those extremes. Career-counseling works just fine in a culture like ours. "Do you wish to remain in the hope of gaining tenure?" is the discussion. "Your work of late has not shown the kind of progressive streak that we look for in our best professors...".
This makes great theatre, Zapp, but do you have any hard evidence that this is in fact a widespread state of affairs?

If not, this kind of thing is simply whistling in the wind, making up stories to validate a false view of the sociology of science, in lieu of engaging with science's actual conclusions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:37 am
Posts: 27
I REALLY like NT Wright. I have a few of his books and have a number of his lectures on mp3. I think he is the top theologian alive today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:42 pm
Posts: 21
Location: Honolulu, HI
andy:

Where did you get that bit on NT Wright? I tend to like his work--always engaging and thought-provoking, if a bit on the provocative side sometimes! I'd be interested to read it.

Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:29 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: Durham, UK
Ah â€â€


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:37 am
Posts: 27
Wow, I can't imagine having such a great speaker and thinker as your local "pastor". There are a number of his talks available online at the NT Wright Page (links to other sites) which I have listened to, so that helps.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:34 am
Posts: 9
Interesting topic even if I am a year late to this discussion.

I read somewhere in the New Testament that Christ (Not Jesus) is the image of God and that Christ is the power and wisdom of God.

So the creation unto the image would then imply Understanding the Power of God so that we can fear it by living in His wisdom so that we can be saved...

Cobra I am sorry to read that you do not like vipers the one you refer to is the most beautiful of them all esp the King Cobra.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 2193
Location: Atlanta
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: http://northpoint.org
It's the Dodge Viper I'm not fond of. The vipers God created are indeed lovely and elegant.

_________________
Cobra (the car, not the poisonous reptile)
all scripture is NRSV unless otherwise noted


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 3:34 am
Posts: 9
:oops: :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:34 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:54 pm
Posts: 2633
Location: Australia
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Anglican
Name of your church: The Uniting Church, North Belconnen.
Protege wrote:
Quote:
I read somewhere in the New Testament that Christ (Not Jesus) is the image of God and that Christ is the power and wisdom of God.


Where does it say that Christ is not Jesus in the New Testament?

Jesus is the Christ, the Annointed One, the Messiah. Therefore the names "Jesus" and "Christ" refer to the same person. If a passage says something about "Christ", it is saying it about Jesus.

If one wants to know what God is like - look at Jesus - who reveals him perfectly, being himself God.

_________________
ImageAvid Reader

Lord, in my zeal for love of truth, let me not forget the truth about love.” - Thomas Aquinas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forum Code of Conduct
Forum Statement of Beliefs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:54 pm
Posts: 2193
Location: Atlanta
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: http://northpoint.org
Protege wrote:
:oops: :twisted:


It's the supercharger -- no turbo lag. Just have to watch out for wheel hop.

_________________
Cobra (the car, not the poisonous reptile)
all scripture is NRSV unless otherwise noted


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 8:38 am
Posts: 103
Faith: Christian
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Baptist
Regarding Gen 1:27

God created man in His own image; in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them.

My understanding is that the Hebrew word translated "man" is normally used to describe "mankind," a collective of individuals.

Soooo, the plural Godhead, the Trinitarian God, a community of "persons," creates a[nother] collective, mankind -- male and female communities. Perhaps the "image of God" is a community of individuals that function's [best] as it conforms to the practiced unity of the Trinitarian God. Perhaps this explains our instinctive desire for community -- the "tribal instnct," as they say.

This would also explain the biblical emphasis on the children of God, whether a nation or a Christian asembly.


Just a thought.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 2:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:29 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: Durham, UK
Nearly another year late into this thread...

I think you're right, jds. Another take on this that's worth adding to the mix is Tom Wright's* point that, in the world of 2000-4000 years ago, images of rulers were put in place to remind populations of who was boss. That's never really changed, in fact, as witness the number of statues of Queen Victoria, Vladimir Lenin or Saddam Hussein the world has recently contained. When you look at those images, they are executed in such a way as to make a point about the kind of person whose authority is being expressed: their grandeur, vision, paternalism, or whatever. Our function as image-bearers of the Living God is to do the same to all the rest of creation — but, of course, in truth, not political or religious spin.

* Bishop of Durham


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group