Bible Forum

The Bible NETWork ~ Impacting the World for Christ one post at a time!

It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 8:23 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:52 pm 
dale77 wrote:
Michael wrote:
Ussher and Lightfoot were cotnradicted by Patrick, Burnett, Whiston, Ray, Llwyd Hobbs and many others 20 years later not to mention the host of those in the 18th century.


Thanks Michael, but can you please provide quotes.

Dale


I provided them

michael


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:10 am
Posts: 72
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Faith: Christian
There seems to be some confusion with you Michael. What I am after in this thread is a quote from a notable christian pre-1800 which says "the earth is at least 100,000 years old" or somesuch. You have provided second hand commentary. Please do us all a favour and post your quote. Ideally it would be good if you could provide a web reference to the source book.

You will notice that I have not yet included Bede in the YE crew, because I haven't yet been able to locate a quote of his chronology. Sure I know where his date 3952BC is located (his book "On the reckoning of Time"), but I can't produce a quote so it stays in the "not quite dating the earth" list with Clement's 5500 odd BC. For now anyway.

Dale

_________________
Its all greek to me...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:10 am
Posts: 72
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Faith: Christian
So this is where we are after a month of postings. It is interesting that the later quotes (e.g. Ussher) are actually for a younger earth than the earlier quotes.

Young earthers, quoted age of earth (in years)

John Calvin, <6000
Augustine, <6000
Theophilus, 5695
Origen, much less than 10,000
Irenaeus, <6000
Lactantius, <6000
Hippolytus of Rome, 5500 at the birth of Christ
John Lightfoot, 3928 at the birth of Christ
James Ussher, 4004 at the birth of Christ

Old earthers, quoted age (in years)

None identified (yet!)

Not quite dating the earth...

Clement of Alexandria, dates Adam at 5592 BC & enigmatically puts creation outside of time.
Eusebius of Caesarea, from Adam to Christ is 5228 years
Venerable Bede, 3952 years before Christ (no quote identified yet, this number is second hand)

_________________
Its all greek to me...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:17 am 
Dale

I think I had better bow down to your superior knowledge and understanding and start to argue that the church has always believed that the earth is young and flat

Michael


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 2:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:29 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: Durham, UK
dale77 wrote:
Clement of Alexandria, dates Adam at 5592 BC & enigmatically puts creation outside of time.

Glad to see you realise that Clement isn't wholly in line with your own view! I'd reiterate, too, my earlier observation that he regards the creation days as figurative.

I'd also be interested in knowing your answer to Vance's question â€â€


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 2:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:37 am
Posts: 27
Agreed.

Obviously, this entire thread had a point beyond merely establishing a fact about what certain people believed in the past. It MUST have a more relevant point than that, or it wouldn't be worth wasting any time on.

All we want to know is what possible relevance such a conclusion could have for us today. How should this assertion influence us, even if correct?

Personally, I see none at all. I see a SOME possible relevance in how the early father's viewed Scripture generally, or their interpretive process, or the degree to which they would allow scientific information to influence that interpretation, which is why I posted so much from Augustine. But what some theologians thought about scientific issues 2000 years ago, or even 200 years ago seems completely irrelevant.

EXCEPT to the extent that many gave us such a example NOT to follow when the geocentrism debate came up, where they let their faulty interpretation of Scripture force them to deny the evidence for a scientific truth about the natural world.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:43 am
Posts: 79
None of the posters have respect for the original question.
All Dale wants to accomplish is to gather any quote(s) of the early church fathers (pre 1800 only) for his own good maybe. Maybe Dale wants to gather enough information to form his own understanding about the age of the earth.
All he asks is any quote with name and date (not a random source pulled out from some of the children book with no name and date).
If you don't have any just say you don't. The best Dale could do to you is thank you. If you are not brave enough to say "I don't know" then don't post. I am supprise that the mods did not lock this thread already since you can't seem to be able to deal with the original question.
Btw, Michael, Dale did not ask in his original question to prove the author of his quote wrong. Stop doing that.

Dale, I don't have any quote to give you.


xeo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:39 am 
xeo wrote:
None of the posters have respect for the original question.
All Dale wants to accomplish is to gather any quote(s) of the early church fathers (pre 1800 only) for his own good maybe. Maybe Dale wants to gather enough information to form his own understanding about the age of the earth.
All he asks is any quote with name and date (not a random source pulled out from some of the children book with no name and date).
If you don't have any just say you don't. The best Dale could do to you is thank you. If you are not brave enough to say "I don't know" then don't post. I am supprise that the mods did not lock this thread already since you can't seem to be able to deal with the original question.
Btw, Michael, Dale did not ask in his original question to prove the author of his quote wrong. Stop doing that.

Dale, I don't have any quote to give you.


xeo


I provided quotes and references but that was no good

Michael


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2006 10:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:37 am
Posts: 27
Xeo, the reason for the way the thread went is that we were anticipating what the purpose behind the question was, and then addressing that purpose.

If I asked the question in another thread "can anyone provide absolute, extra-Biblical proof that Jesus turned water into wine?", do you think the only answers from my fellow believers would be just the obvious "no". Of course not.

As it turns out, when the poster started a new thread stating what his purpose was, it showed that we were correct in our assumption about his purpose and that all of our comments were entirely appropriate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 08, 2006 3:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:10 am
Posts: 72
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Faith: Christian
My purpose for this thread has not changed from the original statement in the top posting. It remains open for any further quotes anyone cares to post.

Here it is again:

dale77 wrote:
There seems to be some doubt in some quarters that the early church was universally YE. Perhaps we could make a roster of recorded comments on the subject? This would give us a nice objective resource.

I'm not aware of any church fathers who held to an old earth. Are there any?

So lets stick with statements by early churchmen (say pre-1800) on "the age of the earth" for this thread. Perhaps Michael could kick things off.

My rules are that the quote must reasonably give an estimate for how old the earth is, hence I don't include those who just specify that the earth was created in six literal days, or those who reference the prophetic significance of the literal genesis days as 1000 year ages in the lifetime of created things. I'll edit this summary as people add quotes... If you want to dispute one of my calls, do it below. That also is a legitimate use of this thread.


This thread is for statements by the early church on the age of the earth. Check the top post for the summary of quotes identified.

Dale

_________________
Its all greek to me...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 4:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:10 am
Posts: 72
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Faith: Christian
Julius Africanus (160-240)

The Egyptians, indeed, with their boastful notions of their own antiquity, have put forth a sort of account of it by the hand of their astrologers in cycles and myriads of years; which some of those who have had the repute of studying such subjects profoundly have in a summary way called lunar years; and inclining no less than others to the mythical, they think they fall in with the eight or nine thousands of years which the Egyptian priests in Plato falsely reckon up to Solon.

(And After Some Other Matter: )

For why should I speak of the three myriad years of the Phoenicians, or of the follies of the Chaldeans, their forty-eight myriads? For the Jews, deriving their origin from them as descendants of Abraham, having been taught a modest mind, and one such as becomes men, together with the truth by the spirit of Moses, have handed down to us, by their extant Hebrew histories, the number of 5500 years as the period up to the advent of the Word of salvation, that was announced to the world in the time of the sway of the Caesars.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/ecf/006/0060050.htm

_________________
Its all greek to me...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:10 am
Posts: 72
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Faith: Christian
Georgios Synkellos ~810 AD, Chronography

Georgios Synkellos wrote:
...on this same holy day of the life-giving resurrection, the 5534th year from the creation of the universe commenced.


Being a Greek monk in Byzantium, George follows the dates from the Greek old testament.

_________________
Its all greek to me...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 10, 2009 7:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 19
Faith: Jewish
Ecclesiology/Denomination: Non-denominational
Name of your church: Mikva yisrael
He wasn't an early church father, but Rabbi Arye Kaplan quotes from a source from about the days of Iesus which gives the age of the universe at 13.5 billion when Adam was created. And he uses biblical verses for his calculations.

_________________
Are your beliefs biblical ?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group